‘Academically Adrift’: The News Gets Worse and Worse

In the last few months of 2010, rumors began circulating among higher-education policy geeks that the University of Chicago Press was about to publish a new book written by a pair of very smart sociologists who were trying to answer a question to which most people thought they already knew the answer: How much do students learn while they’re in college? Their findings, one heard, were … interesting.
The book, Academically Adrift, by Richard Arum and Josipa Roksa, fulfilled that promise—and then some. It was no surprise that The Chronicle gave prominent coverage to the conclusion that “American higher education is characterized by limited or no learning for a large proportion of students,” but few people anticipated that the book would become the rare piece of serious academic scholarship that jumps the fence and roams free into the larger culture.
Vanity Fair used space normally allotted to Kennedy hagiography to call it a “crushing exposé of the heretofore secret society known as ‘college.'” The gossip mavens at Gawker ran the book through their patented Internet cynicism machine and wrote that “To get a college degree, you must go into a soul-crushing amount of debt. And what do yThe New Yorker featured Academically Adrift in a typically brilliant essay by Louis Menand. In one of her nationally syndicated columns, Kathleen Parker called the book a “dense tome” while opining that the failure of higher education constituted a “dot-connecting exercise for Uncle Shoulda, who someday will say—in Chinese—’How could we have let this happen?'” Her response proved that Kathleen Parker has a gift for phrasing and did not actually read the book, whose main text runs to only 144 concise and well-argued pages.
But the definitive evidence of Academically Adrift’s ascension to the very small group of social-science studies whose findings shape conventional wisdom came when President King, the world-weary cynic and longtime leader of Walden College, sipped a martini and reacted to the book’s documentation of declining student work by explaining, “That’s why they come! As long as we give them good grades and a degree, their parents are happy too! Who cares if they can’t reason?”ou get for all that money? Not learning.”

Click On READ MORE

Advertisements

2 comments on “‘Academically Adrift’: The News Gets Worse and Worse

  1. granbee says:

    Unfortunately, this is far too true for many purely liberal arts studies! HOWEVER, I know firsthand it is not all true of the math, science, engineering, etc. academic tracks at colleges and universities. Also, international studies and economics and public relations and linguistics studies are no give away, either. Teaching people to reason is sort of like teaching people to hear music in their dreams–can it really be taught–or can only living, and living fiercely, do that? Wonderful of you to hightlight the way this “academic” tome hit the popular media, Heather. Gives me a chuckle, it does!

    Like

  2. ecig says:

    Great work! That is the kind of info that are meant to be shared across the net. Disgrace on Google for now not positioning this submit higher! Come on over and discuss with my website . Thank you =)

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s